london@oups.org.uk

LOUPS Pub Social: Mindfulness stress management, Dr Jutta Tobias-Mortlock

Clara Clein Wolfe • Jul 20, 2020

"In mindfulness, you cannot lose".


Mindful Stress Management: Coming To Our 5 Senses.


Mindfulness has evolved from something of a zeitgeist topic, to one which appears in a myriad of contexts. Dr Jutta Tobias Mortlock is a social psychologist with extensive, international experience in organisational development. Jutta co-directs the City, University of London's Centre for Excellence in Mindfulness Research, and had delivered an excellent closing session to the LOUPS Mental Health Seminar last September about mindfulness. She made a very welcome return to LOUPS with her brilliant session, Mindfulness stress management: coming to our (5) senses.



Although this session was held in the virtual LOUPS pub owing to Covid-19 (C19) restrictions, Jutta delivered an innovative session which managed to foster a genuine sense of connection-through-sharing among participants while concurrently allowing private reflections and some moments of insight. She covered; what mindfulness is, two different stress antidotes, resilience defined, and questioned our personal takeaway from the session. This report covers these points. However the nature of the lecture, indeed the topic itself, is that people may have different experiences and embrace different key elements, so the presentation is strongly recommended to watch or even re-watch.


What is mindfulness? Its prevalence affords it a taken-for-granted dimension. While meditation can be conflated with mindfulness, it is just one element. Jutta drew upon Kudesia's metacognitive definition, stating that mindfulness is being present, open and flexible. It may seem straightforward, but Jutta posed many questions throughout the session which afforded moments of reflection possibly missing from daily life, such as, how routinely am I fully present? On a diagram of two horizontal arrows facing each other with the left representing STIMULUS and the right (RE)ACTION, Jutta drew our attention to the area where the arrow points meet. The meeting point and the space at this point was met with a third, vertical lightning bolt-esque arrow: NOTICING. Referring back to being present, open and flexible; mindfulness is about cultivating the ability to widen the gap between the horizontal arrows to create more space between a stimulus event and one's reaction to it.


Using an example with a dog demonstrates this principle: A dog is in the garden, when their human goes out. It begins to rain and the human realises their dog is outside in the rain unable to get inside. Jutta asked how the dog would react to when the human opens the back door? Most of the replies were along the lines of "happy to see their human". The dog is in the present; not bitter about being cold or wet. This example is as ingenious as it is simple: no grudge, no ruminating, the dog would just be happy to be reunited.


Another animal was used to further aid in understanding mindfulness. If a fish is hooked it is unable to move as it wants or needs. The first exercise we did was a personal, reflective one where we wrote about when we felt 'hooked by an unhelpful thought'. Then we wrote down what were the facts of the situation and how it made us feel. For an illustrating example, I am hooked by a 'nothing works out/perpetual disaster' thought from multiple calamities. The facts include the 'rona rampage that 2020 has become meaning nearly everything is cancelled or drastically changed. Feelings include, despondent and despicable. Jutta stated that this exercise can be anticlimactic because simply writing down these components can be sufficient to facilitate a shift in thinking, however, she also encouraged us to look over our reflections and decide what the 'best version' of us could do next. Returning to the example of "disaster, C19 impact, and despondence", the best version of me could decide - choose - to be a less dramatic Doomsdayer and better adapt to unpredictability. Jutta referred to Pannebaker's finding that expressive writing increases wellbeing and decreases stress. This activity is an example of making space and Jutta implored us that, should we only take one thing away from the lecture, it is the importance of reflecting and making space for oneself: increasing the gap between the arrows.


The goal of mindfulness is to notice stress and, 'recalibrating our thoughts and actions to be more appropriate'. Distance and compassion are key, as seen in the reflective writing exercise as well as in the lecture's stress antidote #1.


Stress antidote #1 is regular mental exercise. Regular mental exercise represents a classical mindfulness exercise and can appear deceptively simple or 'not rocket science' however, as is the case with physical exercise, it needs the work to be done in order to be of benefit. Consistency is key. Jutta led attendees in a mental exercise of coming to our senses, by focusing on a sense at a time: feeling, hearing and seeing. Briefly, we shut our eyes and concentrated on breathing and how it feels within our body, for example, the rising and falling of the chest. Following on from the focus on feeling, Jutta guided us to focus on hearing and the sounds around us. Rather wonderfully, Jutta's beautiful dog called out a greeting or two to us all during this section! The final sense we came down to was sight, in which we opened our eyes to look at our space and see what we noticed; a pattern, a view, anything we tend to overlook. After this exercise, Jutta asked us how we were feeling and reflected that she was thinking about her dog's interruption. Responders had loved the dog's siren call and spoke of struggling with relaxation. This reiterated the importance of practise. Asked if there was a particularly good time to practise coming down to our senses, Jutta said that there is no one perfect time, it is the practise that is the most important thing so even if circumstances mean there is only a couple of minutes available, fine. Do it! Regular practise of mental exercises reinforces the skill which then leads to being more able to shift oneself out of being hooked on a thought: it builds resilience.


Jutta defined resilience as the ability to 'adapt successfully in the presence of risk and adversity'. Resilient people make space and sense in the present rather than drawing upon past experiences. In the evolutionary beginnings of humans, risks were physical, for example, the need to avoid the risk of being eating. In contemporary life however, risks are more intellectually-based, such as feeling attacked by how someone has spoken, which results in a person becoming hooked by their negative thoughts. Drawing upon Kahneman, Jutta talked about being versus doing. A person doing may be multitasking, problem-solving, and worrying. The doing state is characterised as 'anticipating remembering'. In contrast, the person being is noticing, embodied, and connected with others. The being state is the mindful, present state and neuroimaging studies have found it to reflect better brain activity than the doing state in which a person is more prone to a fight or flight response. Regular practise of mindfulness exercises leads to improved brain function thus reinforcing the importance of consistent practise and the power of neuroplasticity. There is a significant evidence base of replication for this finding, including research conducted with military personnel, who, after following a mental training programme, were found to go into fight or flight mode less than before the programme. Stress management involves balancing the doing and experiencing modes. To reiterate, by practising coming to the five senses, whether over a number of minutes or, in shorter bursts, the skill of intentionally shifting into an experiencing mode from a doing mode becomes easier thus creating more of the space so important in managing stress response. The ability to make space and notice is a skill that necessitates practice and facilitates resilience.


Jutta then asked, "what's your default operating mode?" and offered five topics to consider:


  • disconnecting from technology,
  • being fully present,
  • re-energising interests,
  • having frequent meaningful connections, and
  • getting enough sleep.


Participants were asked to award themselves a tick for each affirmative answer. Perhaps unsurprisingly in these bewildering times, there were a number of no-tick or few-tick attendees. Jutta mentioned the aeroplane oxygen mask instruction in which people are advised to secure their own mask before tending to others. In life, as in plane crises, it is not possible to function well without looking after oneself.

Stress antidote #2 is taking regular mental breaks. These breaks are offline and are for self-replenishment. Jutta asked, what it would take for us to believe in the good science that those who manage stress well, regularly make time for themselves? An interesting question but an important one. Referring back to a lack of ticks, Jutta stated that noticing gives us choice; she said that, 'in mindfulness, you cannot lose' because whether you jump into it feet first, or cautiously reflect upon the underlying science, you have the choice to change. The exercises we did in the lecture will remain with us. Far from being a Pollyanna, Jutta is a scientist: a psychologist separating the robust evidence from the snake oil of commercialised McMindfulness. In a brief lecture on a balmy Friday, Jutta has enabled us to make genuine change to improve our wellbeing, plus, her generously allowing the session to be recorded and uploaded to the OUPS website, means we can re-watch ad infinitum and share with loved ones.


At the end of the lecture, Jutta asked us about our one highlight and one takeaway. Personally, my highlight was the science. My takeaway was and continues to be the way in which so much of the lecture remains. The coming to the five senses practise is personally harrowing due to chronic pain and related issues, but the science of it is nonetheless intriguing and I shall recommend it to people I think it would benefit. The regular breaks is similarly difficult to face but also is something to pass on to others. Jutta's generosity with her time and her recommendations is a further highlight. She provided a slew of free resources. Her recommendation to not focus on the intellectual side of mindfulness in favour of committing to practise is important in a room of people potentially prone to academic self-flagellation or with endless to do lists. Jutta presented mindful stress management in an accessible and enjoyable lecture, expertly framing the science in ways we can apply to daily life by reiterating the importance of any practise rather than the setting of an arbitrary amount. After all, in mindfulness you cannot lose.


Thank you to Jutta and her beautiful dog with spectacular comic timing! Thank you to OUPS for another wonderful event keeping us connected despite being apart.


by Clara Clein Wolfe 31 Jan, 2024
LOUPS Criminology Seminar – 11 th November 2023
by Clara Clein Wolfe 26 Nov, 2023
Magic, mishaps, and maybe toilets: "mindreading" to mitigate disaster. Professor Graham Edgar. (University of Gloucester)  LOUPS Pub Social – October 2023.
by David Byrne 26 Sept, 2023
Kris Ambler (BACP): How to become a BACP-registered Counsellor
by Clara Clein Wolfe 27 Apr, 2023
LOUPS Spring Conference 2023: Mental Health – Working in the System.
by Clara Clein Wolfe 24 Oct, 2022
Criminal Minds: aspects of criminal motivation and behaviour
by Clara Clein Wolfe 03 Aug, 2022
The collective appetite for true crime shows no sign of abating. The adage ‘if it bleeds, it leads’ spans media reporting, television tropes, and documentaries. The deviance of humanity is an enduring topic of investigation. This Summer, Frederick Toates and Olga Coschug-Toates released their book, Understanding Sexual Serial Killing. It is a brilliant read which delves into the myriad aspects of sexual serial killing, such as underlying factors, childhood experiences, and the biological, psychological, and social features. The book is divided into three parts: the factors that underlie lust killing, biographical sketches, and a final word. The factors which underlie lust killing, also known as sexual serial killing, span everything from the brain, motivations, and context. The brain is a source of interest in considering human differences and deviations. For example, Fred and Olga demonstrates the value of studying ‘normal’ brains and those which have been stretched beyond normal/adaptive functioning. However, these [predominantly] men need motivation to commit these crimes and the associated activities such as stalking. There is also the relevance of the context, for example whether the ‘right’ target is available and an absence of obstructions. However, rather than distinct factors, they are entangled, such that a maladapted brain, motivation for sexual domination, and a situation providing an opportunity for sexual killing can be reverse engineered back from murder(s). An excellent aspect of the book is that factors are explained individually as well as linked together thus increasing the depth of understanding, including using biographical sketches. The biographical sketches of eighty sexual serial killers seemed an overwhelming prospect to me, but it was truly invaluable. For any Open University students who have studied DE310 and/or read Mad or Bad? A Critical Approach to Counselling and Forensic Psychology (2017), there are elements which link between the two. For example, the snapshot of ‘Omar’ (p.210) and ‘Mr Bradford’ (pp.221-222), in Mad or Bad… (2017) can be seen in Understanding… in that these sketches involve contradictions and incongruent characteristics if comparing them, yet they are the same person. This is a critical aspect for understanding this population because so often, especially in the media, serial killers can be portrayed as non-human or otherwise an exception to ‘normal’ others. The biographical sketches are illuminating. They do contain difficult themes and experiences, but the book maintains a respectful tone in that it neither dismisses the crimes nor uses previous trauma as justification for them. No black-and-white conceptualisations of the grey. This respect for the lives stolen across the divide of killer and victim is further testament to the quality of the writing and expertise of Fred and Olga by including the nuances and making you reflect upon assumptions or opinions. The final word is the last section of the book. It closes the book and draws together the previous sections. The aim of building and reinforcing on the existing work by using psychological and neuroscientific theories and literature is well achieved. Understanding Sexual Serial Killing is excellent. It is a difficult subject and there are details which cause a visceral response. There are heart-breaking details among the facts. Fred and Olga acknowledge the tragedy and missed opportunities in which interventions could have led to different outcomes. There are biographies of names we recognise from the saturation of true crime media but stories we may not. There are unmistakably some difficult themes and experiences, but it is an accessible book which includes footnotes for additional information or references to the extensive research. Understanding Sexual Serial Killing is an immersive reading experience. The veracity of the information can deliver shocks and distress. I decided to not read at home. Reading the book in public, such as the park, was an interesting experience as details could hit differently. For example, when feeling afraid and hypervigilant one evening, I wondered if I might need to use the sizable book to defend myself. It can be tough to learn the depravity of some parents and the sequence of events behind murders: the split-second decisions or actions which ended in tragedy. Despite the formidable nature of the book, its accessibility allows for readers to put it down if needed to take a break, but it is so compelling you will be right back to it! Whether binge reading or snack reading, you can follow the science, themes, and narrative. This is vital. People from multiple backgrounds can benefit from reading the Understanding Sexual Serial Killing because the lessons and knowledge within the text can help in settings of educational, forensic, health, mental health, and beyond. For example, in the Preface, there is a line which stuck with me during and since reading the book: “in almost all cases, if not every case, the killers feel a deep resentment about things that happened to them, usually in childhood or adolescence” (p.xviii). Therefore, the more people who read this book, the more hope there may be to prevent future sexual serial killing. This is not a Pollyanna fantasy. The number of missed opportunities for alternative outcomes suggest that; far from being a deterministic, linear relationship between maladapted brains, motivations of dominance, and contexts of coalescing opportunity, the pattern can be broken but lessons must be learned. Understanding Sexual Serial Killing, by Frederick Toates and Olga Coschug-Toates is a must-read.
by Clara Clein Wolfe 01 Jan, 2021
Social Robots with Professor Emily Cross: From Social Cognition To Social Robots.
by Clara Clein Wolfe 04 Sept, 2020
Covid-19 (C19) continues to dominate 2020. Fluctuating rates of infection, devastating loss of life, widespread uncertainty, March lockdown, and more recent, local lockdowns, demonstrate the scale of the pandemic's impact upon societies. Psychological research has adapted to the constraints of the 'new normal' and remains studying the thoughts, feelings and behaviour that people exhibit.  On 22nd August 2020, the London branch of the Open University Psychological Society held an online conference entitled, Social Psychology Today. Dr Emma O'Dwyer, Professor John Drury and Professor Elizabeth Stokoe presented lectures about C19 Mutual Aid Groups, the role of social psychology in C19 responses, and the science of coronavirus.
by Clara Clein Wolfe 10 Jul, 2020
A talk by Prof. Neil Frude
by Clara Clein Wolfe 15 Jun, 2020
A talk by Professor Graham Edgar
More posts
Share by: